Discursive Essay free essay sample

Discursive Essay Cosmetic surgery is not widely available on the NHS. Only in certain situations do the NHS pay for cosmetic procedures, but where should the line be drawn between cosmetic surgery necessary and beneficial and people using it because of physcological reasons. The NHS spend around ? 5. 7million on giving people surgery, should costs be cut or rules be tighter. Only on rare occasions do the NHS pay for cosmetic surgery, only if it is required to protect someone’s health. For those with facial disfigurement it would be very difficult to feel ‘normal’ or comfortable with themselves. It seems fair procedures like removement off a faicial birthmark or congenital condition or disfigurement cause by illness or injury to be free on the NHS. People with this kind of problem simply cant help it, and may not have the money to spend on surgery. People in these situations must feel deeply grateful for the NHS’s payments. It would also benefit the government as they would not have to give out unnecessary benefits to people who should not have children. Though in saying this the person that would benefit from stopping teenage pregnancy would be the child itself. No child would want to grow up in slum conditions within a scheme, this being where the majority of underage mothers hail from. Going by some of these would be mothers lives the baby would be better off unborn than to grow up in a community such a scheme. Though with the help of local health clinics and general practitioners it has been proven that in some case of the pill being handed out there have been more pregnancies because of it. The reason being, it encourages the teens to have sex at the age they are at. Why you ask? It encourages them because it allows them to have sex without the worry of getting pregnant. Though at that age kids won’t have a clue on how to use it properly. This put a huge question hovering over the government. Is making the pill easier to acquire for young girls the best idea to cut teenage pregnancy down? Probably not now those studies have found that it can raise pregnancy in teens higher than without it. Though the government has told school nurses to issue the morning after pill to teenage students across the nation in an attempt to tackle teenage pregnancy. This has caused an outrage in parents everywhere as the schools have done this without consulting them first. Some parents asked about this situation have been very angry about the whole thing and have even contacted the police as some of the schools have said they had not known about the situation until they were alerted by it in the news. This is not the case for all of the parents as they said it would be a good idea as long as it has a good outcome. The only thing that bothered this group of parents was that the schools did not run it by them first. Dr David Paton, an economist at Nottingham University Business School, studied records of how many under-16s became pregnant and how many visited family planning clinics in 16 UK regions over a 14-year period. In particular, Dr Paton studied the impact of the case brought by morality campaigner Victoria Gillick in the mid-1980s, in which a court ruled that doctors should tell parents if they gave contraceptives to under-age girls. He found that a year after, the number of teenage girls attending family planning clinics had dropped by a huge margin. This ruling was opposed by many as it was said to increase many teenage pregnancies. Dr Paton said â€Å"Although family planning may make sexually active teenagers less likely to get pregnant, it seems that it also encourages others to start having sex. † His view on it was the same as many and pointed out the fact that the pill can create many more pregnant teenagers. Other doctors are saying giving out pill to schools is a great idea but only as a wide programme. If they are given out to one girl at a time then the girls might not know what to do properly or might not want to talk to their friends about it. So the doctors are advising the schools taking part in the scheme to get the teenage girls to take part in a programme that would them know what taking the pill is about. This gives the girls a chance to ask questions without being embarrassed, to talk to their friends about it and to take the pill properly if needed. Though again it brings up the main fear that easier access to the pill will lead to increased promiscuity in young girls. This is because these schemes are giving girls as young as thirteen a licence to take part in illegal sexual intercourse instead of the protection of the law that the age of consent is there to give. Issuing the pill to underage girls would be a terrible idea as it would probably lead to more underage mothers across the nation. Not only this but it would end up creating incongruous girls that have barely just learnt how to do their multiplication tables. Not handing out the pill in schools would stop underage pregnancies and would mean the child would not have to grow up with poor help from the underage mothers.